Post by jessPost by Richard MagrathI'm not a socialist, of course, but I think the £30 a week is a good
idea (though the £500 bonus seems a bit unnecessary) presuming (and
I'm not doubting) that there were certain criteria: not just economic,
but also in keeping up a certain educational standard
so only clever poor people should do a-levels?
Well, I personally would see it as more of a scholarship than an
extension of the welfare state, so I suppose so, yes. Not just A's, of
course, but A-C would be reasonable I think.
But it's not of course *simply* a case of cleverness/uncleverness. I'm
sure that for 99% of people their A-level grades are related to how
hard they have worked. And if the government is literally paying
people to study, they should put in the work. I'm not saying that lots
of people would treat this as a dodge where they could sign up for
three A-levels and £30 a week and then do only the bare minimum needed
not to be kicked out of school - but rather that for those that did
there would be a system in place to cope with them.
As for the guy who wants his 'back pay', surely a more pressing
concern would be for those who had free university education and who
are now so concerned about the state of the higher sector to give
something back themselves?
Richard